Sunday, December 20, 2009

Logic & Global Warming: Separating the sheep from the intellectual

Q: Is Global Warming really happening?
A: Yes.
How: Modern measurements of climate activity shows an increase in temperature. But is only accurate from the 1940s and on. It is a fact the earth warms and cools through the centuries. What happened to the ice during the 3 major ice ages and 2 super cooling periods recorded during the early Proterozoic Eon, Cryogenian period, the Late Ordovician and the Silurian period, also recorded by Roman historians and during the Middle ages.
Source: J. Imbrie and K.P.Imbrie, Ice Ages: Solving the Mystery (Short Hills NJ: Enslow Publishers) 1979.

Q: Is Global Warming caused by human activity?
A: No.
How: The logical question to ask to is what caused the earth to warm after the 3 ice ages and the 2 minor ice ages? The logical answer is, the earth; because it couldn’t be humanity. The greatest global warming was in the middle ages, which logic dictates that it could in no way have been caused my man.
Source: The Discovery of the Ice Ages. International Reception and Consequences for the Understanding of climate history], Basel 2008, ISBN 978-3-7965-2439-4



Q: Is Global Warming accelerated by human activity?
A: Unknown, but most likely not.
Why: These ice ages and warming periods took place of thousands and millions of years… we have about 70 years of reliable unified recorded data. That is a little blip of the earth’s climate history. This would also include the notion that there is not enough data to draw any reliable conclusion; making this theory and idea unproven, and unreliable because of the lack of support of reliable data. Another problem is the data and reports used to support this theory/idea are unreliable because of admission by the creators of the charts and reports of falsifying data and adding imaginary data to draw a fantasy conclusion. The reliable data points at a different theory and idea.
Sources:
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/do-hacked-e-mails-show-global-warming-fraud/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/5067351/Rise-of-sea-levels-is-the-greatest-lie-ever-told.html
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/copenhagen/article6956783.ece
Also, notice how CO2 goes up, but doesn't effect the temperature.


Q: Can humanity stop Global Warming?
A: Yes, lol, over a 1,750 year period of living in the stone age.
Why: It is calculated that the US would have to stop all energy production related to carbon emissions for 175 years to effect a hundredth of a degree of the earth’s tempter 1 year. Therefore we [US] would have to go back to the stone age for 1,750 to effect the earth’s temp by 1 degree.
Sources:
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/Earth_temp.html
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/offset_calc.htm
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/

Special thanks to Phil Jones for admitting what smart people already knew... Shame you were trying to hide it.

"So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean – but we’d still have to explain the land blip."

"It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”."

"where the heck is global warming ? We are asking that here in Boulder where we have broken records the past two days for the coldest days on record. We had 4 inches of snow. The high the last 2 days was below 30F and the normal is 69F, and it smashed the previous records for these days by 10F. The low was about 18F and also a record low, well below the previous record low."

"The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate."

"If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone... We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind. Tom Wigley has sent me a worried email when he heard about it – thought people could ask him for his model code. He has retired officially from UEA so he can hide behind that."

"I did get an email from the FOI person here early yesterday to tell me I shouldn’t be deleting emails"

"Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?"

"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd [sic] from1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."

"Because of the evidence for loss of temperature sensitivity after 1960 (1), MXD data were eliminated for the post-1960 interval."

- Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit

Read more of Phil's emails here: http://sweetness-light.com/archive/emails-that-damn-cru-head-jones

No comments:

Post a Comment

What do you think?

Bible Verses